Home › Rankings › NCAA D1 › Multi-events

NCAA D1 multi-events rankings, 2026 Outdoor

NCAA D1 · Multi-events · 2026 Outdoor

Men: Illinois. Women: Illinois. Each squad scores its best four multi-events athletes, weighted 1.0, 0.75, 0.5 and 0.25.

1IllinoisLuuk Pelkmans #3 Decathlon · Jip de Greef #4 Decathlon · Andreas Hantson #17 DecathlonSquad of 3194
2Kansas StateEmil Uhlin #7 Decathlon · Dorian Charles #16 DecathlonSquad of 2132
3ConnecticutJoshua Mooney #5 Decathlon · Diarmuid O'Connor #26 DecathlonSquad of 2119
4North Dakota StateZach McGlynn #9 Decathlon · Paul Olson #24 DecathlonSquad of 2112
5BYUBen Barton #1 DecathlonSquad of 1100
6LouisvilleKenneth Byrd #2 DecathlonSquad of 198
7DukeMaxwell Forte #20 Decathlon · Michael Bennett #23 Decathlon · Philip Kastner #35 DecathlonSquad of 395
8KansasJohn Swabik #13 Decathlon · Conor Dunback #32 DecathlonSquad of 288
9Long Beach StateRyan Gregory #6 DecathlonSquad of 188
10Oklahoma StateSteven Schmidt #18 Decathlon · Cooper Moore #27 DecathlonSquad of 284
11Northern IowaCarter Morton #8 DecathlonSquad of 183
12Miami (Fla.)Edgar Campre #10 DecathlonSquad of 178
13High PointCole Wilson #11 DecathlonSquad of 175
14Texas StateEaston Hammond #12 DecathlonSquad of 173
15GeorgiaMaximus Tucker #14 DecathlonSquad of 168
16CaliforniaSeth Johnson #15 DecathlonSquad of 165
17Texas A&MBlake Harris #19 DecathlonSquad of 155
18California State University, FullertonKeith Orona #21 DecathlonSquad of 150

NCAA D1 Power Rankings ›

Other event groups

Common questions

What is the best NCAA D1 multi-events program?

Men: Illinois (squad of 3). Women: Illinois (squad of 2).

Sharing these rankings

Schools, coaches and journalists are welcome to share a ranking with a link to its page. Every number behind a rank is on the page.

Want coaches to see your marks? Preferred Recruit gets athletes' marks in front of college coaches. Get your free recruitment evaluation ›
Looking to run in college? Preferred Recruit gets athletes' marks in front of college coaches. Get your free recruitment evaluation ›