Sign inFree recruitment evaluationFree evaluation
Home › Rankings › NWAC › 2019 Outdoor

NWAC men's and women's track and field Power Rankings, 2019 Outdoor

NWAC · 2019 Outdoor · Final

Men: Lane CC, Spokane CC and Clackamas CC. Women: Lane CC, Spokane CC and Clackamas CC. Every program is ranked on national meet points, projected points from the wind-legal national lists, qualifiers and event-group squads.

✓ National meet results (TFRRS)✓ Wind-legal marks✓ Field sizes from the championshipConference meet points: coming
Open the rankings explorer: every event, week and month ›
2
Spokane CC
94OVR
156Nat'l pts39Qualifiers
1
Lane CC
99OVR
229Nat'l pts44Qualifiers
3
Clackamas CC
87OVR
87Nat'l pts31Qualifiers
#ProgramOVRNationalsListsSquadsQualifiersBest groups
1Lane CC9999229 pts99247 pts999944#1 Sprints#1 Distance#1 Jumps
2Spokane CC9491156 pts93183 pts989639#2 Hurdles#2 Distance#3 Sprints
3Clackamas CC878287 pts8292 pts959231#1 Hurdles#2 Jumps#2 Multi-events
4Mt. Hood CC85▲28180 pts7763 pts919130#2 Sprints#3 Hurdles#3 Jumps
5Everett CC83▲27971 pts7759 pts888724#3 Distance#4 Sprints#7 Jumps
6CClark College82▼17862 pts7551 pts888622#4 Throws#5 Sprints#6 Distance
7SSW Oregon CC80▲17444 pts7234 pts868622#2 Throws#5 Multi-events#6 Hurdles
8TTreasure Valley CC78▲17339 pts7443 pts867812#4 Distance#5 Hurdles#8 Jumps
9Olympic College76▼57336 pts7338 pts808015#5 Jumps#5 Throws#8 Distance
10Umpqua CC726713 pts646 pts797610#4 Multi-events#9 Distance#9 Throws
11GGreen River College72▼1645 pts633 pts817610#6 Sprints#8 Hurdles#9 Jumps

NWAC men's event-group squads

A squad scores its best four athletes, weighted 1.0, 0.75, 0.5 and 0.25, so one great athlete counts and real depth still wins. A squad needs at least one athlete inside the championship field.

1Lane CCJacob Williams 97 · #2 200m · Nathan Poff 95 · #3 400m · Josh Peterson 94 · #4 400m · Nick Rogozinski 94 · #6 200mSquad of 499
2Mt. Hood CCAndre Dorn 99 · #1 400m · Elijah Johnson 92 · #6 100m · Justin Kavanagh 91 · #7 400m · Jerrell Jae Waddell 84 · #14 400mSquad of 492
3Spokane CCJJ Curry 98 · #1 200m · Matt Mason 88 · #11 100m · TJ Davis 82 · #16 100m · Ryan Slack 79 · #19 100mSquad of 490
4Everett CCOluwadamilol Adekanbi 96 · #2 100m · Sadath Aboudou 91 · #8 200m · Langston Barlow 89 · #10 100m · Kyle Duncan 86 · #13 100mSquad of 488
5CClark CollegeJett Pharn-Cromb 94 · #5 200m · Micah Kinnunen 93 · #7 200m · Theodore Hunter 69 · #28 100m · Dominic Lee 64 · #32 100mSquad of 487
6GGreen River CollegeXavier Borrero 91 · #9 200m · Andre Sawyer 80 · #20 200m · Joseph Fagan 78 · #22 200m · Sayer McDonald 72 · #26 400mSquad of 478
7SSW Oregon CCKawika Fernandez 86 · #12 400m · Everett Evanoff 86 · #13 400m · Cole George 77 · #22 400m · Rashaad Hines 76 · #25 200mSquad of 478
8Clackamas CCEthan Ferte 88 · #10 400m · J.J. Walker 83 · #16 400m · Jason Miller 82 · #18 200m · Jordan Gloden 78 · #21 100mSquad of 478
9TTreasure Valley CCWes White 89 · #9 400m · Jesse Bale 84 · #15 400m · Conner Berrett 73 · #25 400mSquad of 377

Share the ranking

TRACK & FIELD STANDARDS · POWER RANKINGS
#1
NWAC men's Power Ranking
Lane CC
99OverallNWACDivision229National pts
2019 OUTDOOR · trackandfieldstandards.com

How the Power Index works

The formula

  • National meet points (30%): scored 10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1 from the championship places
  • Projected points (20%): 10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1 for the top 8 on each wind-legal national list
  • Event-group squads (25%): sprints, hurdles, distance, jumps, throws and multis for men and women; each squad scores its best four athletes, weighted 1.0, 0.75, 0.5 and 0.25
  • Qualifiers (15%): individual entrants at the national meet
  • Conference meet points (10%): added once conference results are saved

Each part is scaled against the division leader. Every rating is out of 99 like a video game, and it is relative to the division: the best team in is 99 in . Everyone else is 60 + 39 × (their score ÷ the leader's)^0.6, and a rating never rises as you go down a list. 90+ elite, 80s national-level, 70s strong, 60s ranked. After the national meet, the final order follows the official team scores, so the national champion is #1; the Power Index breaks ties and orders the teams that didn't score.

Checked against the data

  • National points scored from the championship places
  • 54 wind-aided marks replaced with each athlete's legal best
  • Field size per event counted from the championship results
  • Every athlete counted once per event; B and C squads count for their school

An athlete's score is half list place (100 at #1, 50 at the last spot inside the championship field, 0 at twice that depth) and half mark quality against the division's average marks since 2016. Full methodology with a worked example ›

Other divisions

NCAA D1 Power RankingsNCAA D2 Power RankingsNCAA D3 Power RankingsNAIA Power RankingsNJCAA Power RankingsAll rankings

Want to reach a program like these? See how Preferred Recruit gets athletes recruited.

Common questions

What is the best NWAC men's track and field team in 2019 Outdoor?

Lane CC, with 229 points at the national meet, ahead of Spokane CC and Clackamas CC.

What is the best NWAC women's track and field team in 2019 Outdoor?

Lane CC, with 240 points at the national meet, ahead of Spokane CC and Clackamas CC.

How often do the rankings update?

Every Monday during the indoor and outdoor seasons. Each finished season keeps its final ranking on its own page.

Sharing these rankings

Schools, coaches and journalists are welcome to share a ranking with a link to its page. Every number behind a rank is on the page.

Want coaches to see your marks? Preferred Recruit gets athletes' marks in front of college coaches. Get your free recruitment evaluation ›
Looking to run in college? Preferred Recruit gets athletes' marks in front of college coaches. Get your free recruitment evaluation ›