Sign inFree recruitment evaluationFree evaluation
Home › Rankings › NWAC

NWAC men's and women's track and field Power Rankings, 2026 Outdoor

NWAC · 2026 Outdoor · Final

Men: Spokane CC, Lane CC and Umpqua CC. Women: Spokane CC, Lane CC and Umpqua CC. Every program is ranked on national meet points, projected points from the wind-legal national lists, qualifiers and event-group squads.

✓ National meet results (TFRRS)✓ Wind-legal marks✓ Field sizes from the championshipConference meet points: coming
Open the rankings explorer: every event, week and month ›
2
Lane CC
90OVR
116Nat'l pts38Qualifiers
1
Spokane CC
99OVR
253Nat'l pts51Qualifiers
3
Umpqua CC
84OVR
92Nat'l pts22Qualifiers
#ProgramOVRNationalsListsSquadsQualifiersBest groups
1Spokane CC9999253 pts99283 pts999951#1 Sprints#1 Hurdles#1 Distance
2Lane CC9084116 pts87154 pts969338#1 Jumps#2 Distance#3 Hurdles
3Umpqua CC84▲38192 pts7881 pts918422#2 Jumps#3 Sprints#3 Distance
4CClark College84▼18085 pts7773 pts918524#2 Hurdles#4 Sprints#5 Jumps
5Clackamas CC82▼17871 pts7768 pts888626#1 Throws#7 Hurdles#8 Jumps
6SSW Oregon CC82▲37448 pts7239 pts918829#2 Multi-events#5 Distance#5 Throws
7Mt. Hood CC75▲37339 pts7027 pts817612#4 Hurdles#5 Sprints#9 Throws
8GGreen River College75▼37338 pts7344 pts867916#2 Sprints#6 Jumps#7 Distance
9TTreasure Valley CC74▼27236 pts7134 pts79738#4 Distance#8 Sprints#8 Hurdles
10Olympic College74▼27027 pts6613 pts817814#3 Jumps#7 Throws
11Everett CC74659 pts633 pts828118#8 Distance#8 Throws#9 Jumps

NWAC men's event-group squads

A squad scores its best four athletes, weighted 1.0, 0.75, 0.5 and 0.25, so one great athlete counts and real depth still wins. A squad needs at least one athlete inside the championship field.

1Spokane CCJalen Brightful 99 · #1 100m · Jayden Boyles 99 · #1 200m · Talan Hughes 99 · #1 400m · Ezekiel Glenn 89 · #14 400mSquad of 499
2GGreen River CollegeJordan Miller 99 · #2 100m · Kai Olson 96 · #3 400m · Josiah Brown 93 · #7 400m · Siyabonga Mathews 92 · #11 200mSquad of 498
3Umpqua CCKeiron Desouza 98 · #3 200m · Brian Mills 95 · #5 400m · Easton Raber 88 · #16 100m · Elijah Williams 85 · #22 200mSquad of 493
4CClark CollegeKoynn Williamdyke 98 · #2 400m · Max Ensinger 96 · #4 400m · Chris Garnett 95 · #7 100m · Ian Ebinger 90 · #13 400mSquad of 493
5Mt. Hood CCTrevor Sippel 94 · #9 200m · Elijah Brooks 91 · #10 400m · Isaac Fitch 87 · #16 400m · River Mcclure 85 · #20 100mSquad of 486
6Lane CCLogan Moreno 96 · #5 200m · Isaiah Stewart 96 · #6 200m · Elijah Rice 91 · #11 400m · Sawyer Hallberg 88 · #18 200mSquad of 484
7SSW Oregon CCBryce Davis 95 · #7 200m · Jayson Schweim 90 · #12 400m · Rowan Olney-Miller 83 · #21 400m · Carmine Taetuna-Fautanu 75 · #39 200mSquad of 484
8TTreasure Valley CCJose Torres 95 · #8 200m · Claytin Harper 91 · #11 100m · Omar Osman 84 · #22 100m · Leland Tamez 78 · #25 400mSquad of 482
9Clackamas CCBrayden Nee 94 · #8 100m · River Delco 86 · #17 400m · Chaz Rockett 82 · #22 400m · Luis Valdovinos 77 · #32 200mSquad of 481
10Everett CCAlexander Rabena 94 · #6 400m · Luke Taylor 77 · #27 400m · Anthoney Ray-Kirk 71 · #44 200m · Darrich Sitthivong 63 · #53 200mSquad of 479
11Olympic CollegeOctavian Clark 90 · #13 100m · Noah Ring 89 · #17 200m · Jaxson Mccrimmon 88 · #17 100m · Oliver Horton 73 · #32 400mSquad of 478
All NWAC sprints squads ›

Share the ranking

TRACK & FIELD STANDARDS · POWER RANKINGS
#1
NWAC men's Power Ranking
Spokane CC
99OverallNWACDivision253National pts
2026 OUTDOOR · trackandfieldstandards.com

How the Power Index works

The formula

  • National meet points (30%): scored 10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1 from the championship places
  • Projected points (20%): 10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1 for the top 8 on each wind-legal national list
  • Event-group squads (25%): sprints, hurdles, distance, jumps, throws and multis for men and women; each squad scores its best four athletes, weighted 1.0, 0.75, 0.5 and 0.25
  • Qualifiers (15%): individual entrants at the national meet
  • Conference meet points (10%): added once conference results are saved

Each part is scaled against the division leader. Every rating is out of 99 like a video game, and it is relative to the division: the best team in is 99 in . Everyone else is 60 + 39 × (their score ÷ the leader's)^0.6, and a rating never rises as you go down a list. 90+ elite, 80s national-level, 70s strong, 60s ranked. After the national meet, the final order follows the official team scores, so the national champion is #1; the Power Index breaks ties and orders the teams that didn't score.

Checked against the data

  • National points scored from the championship places
  • 57 wind-aided marks replaced with each athlete's legal best
  • Field size per event counted from the championship results
  • Every athlete counted once per event; B and C squads count for their school

An athlete's score is half list place (100 at #1, 50 at the last spot inside the championship field, 0 at twice that depth) and half mark quality against the division's average marks since 2016. Full methodology with a worked example ›

NWAC team rankings by event

Past seasons

Other divisions

Want to reach a program like these? See how Preferred Recruit gets athletes recruited.

Common questions

What is the best NWAC men's track and field team in 2026 Outdoor?

Spokane CC, with 253 points at the national meet, ahead of Lane CC and Umpqua CC.

What is the best NWAC women's track and field team in 2026 Outdoor?

Spokane CC, with 180 points at the national meet, ahead of Lane CC and Umpqua CC.

How often do the rankings update?

Every Monday during the indoor and outdoor seasons. Each finished season keeps its final ranking on its own page.

Sharing these rankings

Schools, coaches and journalists are welcome to share a ranking with a link to its page. Every number behind a rank is on the page.

Want coaches to see your marks? Preferred Recruit gets athletes' marks in front of college coaches. Get your free recruitment evaluation ›
Looking to run in college? Preferred Recruit gets athletes' marks in front of college coaches. Get your free recruitment evaluation ›