NWAC men's and women's track and field Power Rankings, 2023 Outdoor
NWAC · 2023 Outdoor · Final
Power Rankings
Men: Lane CC, Spokane CC and Clackamas CC. Women: Lane CC, Clark College and Spokane CC. Every program is ranked on national meet points, projected points from the wind-legal national lists, qualifiers and event-group squads.
✓ National meet results (TFRRS)✓ Wind-legal marks✓ Field sizes from the championshipConference meet points: coming
A squad scores its best four athletes, weighted 1.0, 0.75, 0.5 and 0.25, so one great athlete counts and real depth still wins. A squad needs at least one athlete inside the championship field.
1Lane CCLandyn Dupper 99 · #1 100m · Brandon Gailey 96 · #3 100m · Aaron Chao 94 · #6 100m · Dylan Heath 94 · #5 400mSquad of 499
2Spokane CCMichael Byers 96 · #3 400m · Dalton Wild 96 · #3 200m · Christian Hansen 95 · #5 100m · Zach Merrifield 92 · #8 200mSquad of 497
3SSW Oregon CCRaekwon Weatherspoon 97 · #2 100m · Kaleb Scott 92 · #7 400m · Jaydon Davis 82 · #18 100m · Toby Balaam 69 · #30 100mSquad of 487
4TTreasure Valley CCOsman Osman 99 · #1 400m · Reuben Manzer 72 · #22 400m · Triston Kautz 69 · #25 400mSquad of 385
5CClark CollegeJ'Quan Collins 94 · #5 200m · Hudson Schneider 93 · #7 100m · Ethan Arnett 87 · #14 100m · JT Myles 79 · #22 100mSquad of 485
6Everett CCKhalil Gilbert 97 · #2 400m · Aiden Luhr 84 · #16 100m · Miguel Hurtado 80 · #24 200m · Kaden Chidester 79 · #17 400mSquad of 485
7GGreen River CollegeNazar Tarasov 95 · #4 400m · Donald Barnes 81 · #20 100m · Ashtin Harris 75 · #26 100m · Cole Riley 74 · #21 400mSquad of 481
8Mt. Hood CCOliver Reis 89 · #11 100m · Brayan Perez 88 · #13 100m · Deghlan Johnson 74 · #27 200mSquad of 378
A squad scores its best four athletes, weighted 1.0, 0.75, 0.5 and 0.25, so one great athlete counts and real depth still wins. A squad needs at least one athlete inside the championship field.
1Lane CCSara McKen 98 · #1 100m · Jazmine Dotson 96 · #3 100m · Tori Houg 95 · #4 100m · Isabel Tapley 94 · #6 100mSquad of 499
3Lane CCAlonna Nalls 94 · #3 HeptathlonSquad of 186
4Umpqua CCAvery Shinkle 86 · #6 HeptathlonSquad of 179
Share the ranking
TRACK & FIELD STANDARDS · POWER RANKINGS
#1
NWAC women's Power Ranking
Lane CC
99OverallNWACDivision201National pts
2023 OUTDOOR · trackandfieldstandards.com
How the Power Index works
The formula
National meet points (30%): scored 10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1 from the championship places
Projected points (20%): 10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1 for the top 8 on each wind-legal national list
Event-group squads (25%): sprints, hurdles, distance, jumps, throws and multis for men and women; each squad scores its best four athletes, weighted 1.0, 0.75, 0.5 and 0.25
Qualifiers (15%): individual entrants at the national meet
Conference meet points (10%): added once conference results are saved
Each part is scaled against the division leader. Every rating is out of 99 like a video game, and it is relative to the division: the best team in is 99 in . Everyone else is 60 + 39 × (their score ÷ the leader's)^0.6, and a rating never rises as you go down a list. 90+ elite, 80s national-level, 70s strong, 60s ranked. After the national meet, the final order follows the official team scores, so the national champion is #1; the Power Index breaks ties and orders the teams that didn't score.
Checked against the data
National points scored from the championship places
48 wind-aided marks replaced with each athlete's legal best
Field size per event counted from the championship results
Every athlete counted once per event; B and C squads count for their school
An athlete's score is half list place (100 at #1, 50 at the last spot inside the championship field, 0 at twice that depth) and half mark quality against the division's average marks since 2016. Full methodology with a worked example ›