Home › Explore › NCAA D2 › Men's 300m Hurdles

NCAA D2 Men's 300m Hurdles Recruiting Standards

Target, Recruit and Walk-On marks for every NCAA D2 program in the men's 300m Hurdles, most reachable Walk-On first. The middle half of programs: Target 37.56 to 39.70, Recruit 38.00 to 40.39, Walk-On 39.50 to 41.79. ★ = the school's own published standards.

SchoolConferenceTargetRecruitWalk-On
Coker University ★South Atlantic39.0042.5048.0
Minot State University ★Northern Sun39.1042.5545.50
Ferris State University ★GLIAC––42.00
Seton Hill University ★PSAC–39.542.00
Texas A&M University-KingsvilleLone Star Conference39.8940.3941.89
University of Missouri-St. LouisGLVC39.3940.5941.79
University of Findlay ★G-MAC––41.50
Lake Superior State University ★GLIAC–40.5041.30
Western Oregon University ★GNAC39.8–41
The University of North Carolina at Pembroke ★Conference Carolinas54.7038.0040.90
Northwest Missouri State UniversityMIAA37.5637.8640.46
Indiana University of PennsylvaniaPSAC39.7039.8040.30
California University of PennsylvaniaPSAC39.7039.8040.30
Academy of Art UniversityPacWest38.7339.4740.16
Savannah State University ★SIAC–38.5040.10
Fort Valley State University ★SIAC36.50"38"40"
Concordia University IrvinePacWest38.3139.2040.00
Minnesota State University, Mankato ★Northern Sun–38.5039.50
West Chester University of Pennsylvania ★PSAC–38.539.5
Fort Hays State University ★MIAA37.5–39.00
The University of Texas at Tyler ★Lone Star–37.5039.00
University of Virginia's College at WiseSAC36.5937.7938.99
Cal State Monterey BayCCAA37.7038.3038.85
Limestone UniversitySAC36.2937.4938.69
Azusa Pacific University ★PacWest–43.0–
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (Daytona Beach) ★Peach Belt–38.5–
Lenoir-Rhyne University ★South Atlantic37.0/53.5–38.0/55.0
Maryville University of St. Louis ★GLVC–38.1–
Regis University ★RMAC–42.00–
Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania ★PSAC–38.00–
Virginia Union University ★CIAA–38.5–
Looking to run in college? Preferred Recruit gets athletes' marks in front of college coaches. Get your free recruitment evaluation ›